When it comes
to Scotch Whisky, we’re pretty crazy about Ardbeg‘s base 10 year Scotch Whisky.
It’s one of the best primary releases in the whisky space and a spirit we’re
constantly revisiting. But Ardbeg isn’t the kind of distillery that rests on
their laurels. Every once in a while they put out a limited release that is
truly special. Previously, these limited releases have included Ardbeg Airigh
Nam Beist Islay Single Malt Whisky, Ardbeg Rollercoaster and Ardbeg Supernova,
all exceptional whiskys worthy of buying and collecting. The Ardbeg Uigeadail
Traditional Strength Islay Single Malt Whisky is another in this line of
exceptional Ardbeg whiskys. Bottled at a higher proof than the Ardbeg 10 and
finished in Sherry casks, the Uigeadail is one of the strongest and best
expressions of peat that we’ve seen. Deep, deep smokey notes are supported by
the raisin and honey notes from the Sherry casks and it all comes together in a
scotch whisky that will blow your tastebuds away.Given the
limited nature of Ardbeg’s releases, Ardbeg Uigeadail is the kind of gift that
will be sipped and savored, and once it’s vanished from the market you’ll wish
you had bought yourself a bottle, too.
Review:
Ardbeg
Uigeadail is my favourite malt whisky. When I tasted the first bottle which I
bought in September 2010 I went back to the store 5 days later and bought 3
more bottles from the same store off of the same shelf, because I was
astonished at how good the Ardbeg Uigeadail was, and I wanted to have that
wonderful drink available for drinking for a very long time. Three months
later, as my first bottle was nearing the end, I purchased 1 additional bottle
from a different liquor store. When my first bottle was empty I opened the
single lone bottle which I had purchased the most recently. I sipped first in
surprise, then in increasing horror as I did not experience what I had remembered
of the flavour and the feeling of my first bottle. Upon further tastings over a
couple of weeks the second bottle continued to give me exactly the same less
than impressive flavour as it had with the first taste of it. First I asked
myself whether this was the flavour that I had experienced from bottle # 1 and
maybe my taste had changed in the interval that had elapsed. Finally I decided
that I should sample bottle # 3, which had come from the same shelf as the
sainted bottle #1. Low and behold bottle # 3 tastes exactly like all of my
memories from bottle # 1 and gives me the type of transcendent experience that
leads me to rate this whisky at 98 pts. To bottle # 2 I would give about an 86
pt rating, decent, but not at all head of the pack, or close to being an
all-time favourite whisky.
Nose: for
bottle # 1 & 3, the nose is very brightly perfumed, like carnations with
rosewater, peat, pleasant sherry and some briny and medicinal elements. For # 2
the nose is duller, lower pitched, less floral, and sort of muffled in its
expression.
Taste: for #
1 & 3 the sweet sherry and the strong peat, medicinal, and briny elements
combine into an amazing bright integrated fabric. There is a sort of harmony
being played out here between the very high soprano notes of the sherry, and
the bass earthy notes brought out through the peat and the briny/iodiny
elements. You can still taste some nice malted barley here, sort of closeted
between the high winey and low earthy notes. For bottle # 2 the sherry notes
fall completely flat. They are not soprano or even alto, but more bass-baritone
range. The sherry here is not bright, is not very tasty, and does not offer the
beautiful contrast to the bass note elements that is afforded in the other
bottles. The overall effect of sipping # 2 is heavy, almost leaden.
Finish: for
bottles # 1 & # 3 the finish retains all of the spectacular flavours
equally strongly for a very long time. For bottle # 2 the sub-par sherry
flavour actually deteriourates somewhat into the finish, and becomes both sour
and less tasty. The finish here is also rather long, but it is not balanced,
and not so very pleasant.Balance: # 1
& # 3 have everything going for them in all departments. Bottle # 2 is not
very balanced, not nearly as pleasant tasting or as appealing to the nose, and
then gets somewhat less appealing on the finish. At the end of this experience
I am extemely optimistic about the quality of my remaining 3 bottles of Ardbeg
Uigeadail, but am completely in doubt about what I will encounter if I am to
buy an additional new bottle of that whisky. This experience has led me to
reassess some others' lukewarm reviews of Uigeadail, or those who felt that it
needed water to open up. I go to water as a last ditch attempt to find a way to
enjoy a whisky when I am not satisfied with what comes straight from the
bottle. Maybe those others were drinking from the stock of bottle # 2. The
summary observation I make from this is to remind myself that whiskies are
living beings and not standardized widgets off of an assembly-line. There are
definite batch to batch variations, and sometimes bottle to bottle variations.
Sometimes those variations are of a very significant magnitude and can make the
difference between an outstanding whisky and one which is merely mediocre. (My
rating is of bottles # 1 and # 3).